On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 11:57 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Build System wrote: > > Broken deps for i386 > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > anjuta - 1:2.1.0-1.fc7.i386 requires libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0 > > conglomerate - 0.9.1-3.fc7.i386 requires libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0 > > drivel - 2.1.0-0.4.20060527cvs.fc7.i386 requires libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0 > > gedit-plugins - 2.18.0-2.fc7.i386 requires libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0 > > glom - 1.4.4-1.fc7.i386 requires libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0 > > gnome-genius - 0.7.7-2.fc7.i386 requires libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0 > > gnome-python2-gtksourceview - 2.18.0-4.fc8.i386 requires libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0 > > gobby - 0.4.3-1.fc7.i386 requires libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0 > > libgtksourceviewmm - 0.3.1-1.fc8.i386 requires libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0 > > nemiver - 0.4.0-1.fc8.i386 requires libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0 > > ruby-gtksourceview - 0.16.0-6.fc8.i386 requires libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0 > > scratchpad - 0.3.0-3.fc8.i386 requires libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0 > > > > I've noticed that quite a few of these have been in here for a while now, as > Games SIG member I've filed bugs for the games related ones, but I wonder, > maybe bugs should get autofiled if a package stays in here for > 1 week? > The gtksourceview-1 bugs are known and should be fixed in the next couple days. We're going to be providing both gtksourceview 1.x and 2.x in rawhide but there was a guideline change needed for the second package to be approved. That has happened and we are just waiting the three business days since reporting for FESCo to have a chance to veto the change. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
