On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:09:32 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Rum is listed in the potential problems section but the review request > was closed because upstream lost interest in maintaining it. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205504 I see 3 options (given the package has been approved already): 1. find a maintainer willing to own it (maybe the person who reviewed) 2. mark it dead in CVS 3. drop the FE-ACCEPT blocker (and lose the reviewing work...) Any takers ? > > sundaram at redhat dot com olpc-utils > > This package has not been pushed into devel after talking to J5. Not > sure what the plan is. Yea, I'm still unsure how to handle EPEL and OLPC only packages. Should they be listed in owners.list ? pro: they are part of the Fedora project con: they do not appear in the Fedora package collection itself Thoughts ? Christian -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
