On Friday, 06 July 2007 at 03:37, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Why are updates lingering in updates-testing for weeks when: > * they are known broken and/or > * they have already been replaced by a new version, which is already in > stable? > IMHO, that's really what the "unpush" option is for. For example, do we > really need to have that obsolete Thunderbird RC sitting in testing > forever when the actual release is already out in the stable updates? > This also makes it harder to track down the legitimate updates which have > been sitting in testing for way too long. This is exactly the kind of thing that should be automated, i.e. run a script once a week that'd check if there are any obsolete updates in testing and delete them (notifying the owner perhaps). Regards, R. -- Fedora contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
