ons, 04 07 2007 kl. 10:26 +0200, skrev Valent Turkovic: > Can you please explain how would that work in a little more detail? I > get great benefit from beagle searching my mail, web pages and local > documents... how would I benefit from beagle integration to amarok or > audacious or some other player I use? I don't see what beagle would do > there so please explain. Okay imagine you down.. acquire a new album, with beagle indexing this it would automatically be added to your library, you could move the files around and the library would not break. Okay, lemme give you an example, I recently ripped some The Smashing Pumpkins albums, I did so outside of my media player and I forgot to double check that the metadata was correct. Then I imported the resulting flac files into Banshee and notice that some of the albums were labelled as "Smashing Pumpkins" so I corrected that but the files weren't moved into the same directory. So I moved them manually.. and voila Banshee now looks for the files in the wrong dir. With an indexed solution this would be a non issue, I could move my files around like I wanted and have my library be consistent. This is just a simple use case for an index, you can do a lot of fun and useful things with this type of technology that are more advanced. The problem is that currently the technology isn't at the stage where any applications are really relying on an index. Right now that means that Beagle is basically a very handy way to search my massive archive of mail, considering the current downsides one has to wonder if it's worth enabling by default. - David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt underskrevet brevdel
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list