-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hikaru Amano wrote: > +1 to a single tool for managing repos globally, rather than every > apps have its own repo control, which is , IMHO, make stuff feels more > complicated .. Umm...ok let me rephrase the query. Is this a move towards a single tool or is this a move towards a single way of handling repository information with multiple tools being able to access it and perhaps provide enhanced functionality. The second method does mean that the metadata required to be handle would perhaps require discussion - -- You see things; and you say 'Why?'; But I dream things that never were; and I say 'Why not?' - George Bernard Shaw -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGi6ZhXQZpNTcrCzMRAqV/AJ9S9GGvrnX8GYy/Ka1N+mcGCdZwwgCcDRGd bEYfYoTGXE33qXiKK67lqGo= =2hBT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
