I understand all about why it is not possible for fedora not to include codecs and non-gpl software. Also I understand that directly linking from Fedora or an official Fedora website to http://rpm.livna.org is considered "contributory infingement" But if it there was a gpl package in fedora (something like fedora helper[1]) that prompted you to enable it only if you are in a county in which it is legal to do so, and then presents a disclaimer that says that it is unlegal to enable this program for linking to 3rd party repost if you are in the US and if you do so Fedora/Red Hat are not held responsible. Would this make it legal for Fedora to include such package and distribute it? This way fedora is not directly linking to 3rd party repos. Cam somebody (preferably Red Hat lawyers or somebody close to them) explain this "contributory infingement" thing. Was there a such discussion where Red Hat lawyers actually explained what can and can't be done? If it was is it somewhere on the record for review? [1] http://www.brandonhutchinson.com/Fedora_Helper.html -- http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241 Skype: valent.turkovic -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
