Ian Chapman wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hmm, I'm not so sure if thats a good plan. I don't like breaking
soname's, no F-7 is still somewhat new. But FC-6 is by Fedora
standards now proven and trusted, should we go breaking soname's there?
If there was a stack of items in the Fedora repo that depended on 0.4.x
I'd be a lot less inclined, but with so few packages depending on it, I
think the impact would be negligable but if you'd rather leave ogre and
chess as is, I won't push for FC6.
I agree the stack within Fedora is small, I'm afraid however that people might
have manually installed packages depending on this, and I don't want to cause
breakage to those. I must admit chances of this happening are small though. So
if there is a strong desire to upgrade for FC-6 too, then I can live with that.
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
