Ralf Corsepius wrote:
The background behind all this:
Do people consider it worth to have OSG-1 and OSG-2 packages in
parallel?
Note I'm not an OSG user, but judging from this thread, yes that sounds like
the best solution.
The run-time environments/packages could rather easily be made
installable in parallel (e.g. by introducing a set of OSG-2 packages),
but implementing this for the devel packages would be non-trivial.
If it really is a lot of pain to make them parallel installable, why not make
the -devel packages conflict each other? Its not pretty but developers should
be able to cope with that, and normal users don't need these packages.
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
