Re: RFE: Use generic names in packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 14:21 +0530, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray wrote:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826
> 
> I have a couple of review requests which may be affected by the
> outcome of this discussion. Specifically whether one should append
> "fedora-" to the names of the *.desktop files or use the "X-Fedora"
> category in the *.desktop files installed by these packages in
> /usr/share/applications ?

The packaging guidelines seem pretty clear to me.  For new packages, if
upstream uses <vendor_id>, leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as
<vendor_id>.

And where in the packaging guidelines does it say that you should be
adding the X-Fedora category?

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755

Later, 
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux