Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:04:27 -0400, Jeroen van Meeuwen (kanarip) wrote: > >> Author: kanarip >> >> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/revisor/F-7 >> In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10220/F-7 >> >> Modified Files: >> revisor.spec sources >> Log Message: >> 2.0.3.12-2 > >> -BuildArch: noarch >> +BuildArch: noarch ppc ppc64 > > You seem to be confused about why your "%ifnarch" usage in the spec > doesn't work. It is because you build "noarch", where the arch doesn't > matter. It is an arch-independent build. Unless the compose tool is > broken, it would still ship the noarch build for ppc/ppc64. > Apparently, you now want to hack the buildarch parameter and create > multiple builds of the package: noarch with Requires livecd-tools, and > arch-specific ppc/ppc64 without Requires livecd-tools. > > This is something that has been a topic before. A "noarch" package > which depends on arch-specific packages, which are not available for > all arches, cannot really be noarch or should use ExcludeArch properly > (which is another ugly hack). The only alternative with current RPM is > to not build "noarch". Then you can get your ifarch/ifnarch to work. > Thanks, that figures. ExcludeArch is back in, %if(n)arch magic is out. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -kanarip -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
