-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: > Currently mock configs make use of a 'groups' repo to provide > a 'buildsys-build' meta-package. This meta-package has a set of Requires: > that are used to create the 'minimal buildroot' mock uses to start builds. > This repo also provides a 'buildsys-macros' package. Historically this > package would define things like the %dist tag and post-build actions. > > Today, in rawhide, fedora-release provides the %dist like macro definitions. > The post-build definition can be moved to redhat-rpm-config as well. This > would obviate the need for buildsys-macros. That would just leave the > meta-package to populate the buildroot. > > Since mock supports installing a group rather than a (meta)package, I propose > we define the buildsys-build group in the comps group directly. This would > obviate the need for a single point of failure within mock building, > the 'groups' repo. > > Here is the change I would make to comps: > > diff -u -r1.28 comps-f8.xml.in > --- comps-f8.xml.in 27 Jun 2007 20:47:51 -0000 1.28 > +++ comps-f8.xml.in 28 Jun 2007 17:27:19 -0000 > @@ -486,6 +486,33 @@ > </packagelist> > </group> > <group> > + <id>buildsys-build</id> > + <_name>Buildsystem building group</_name> > + <_description/> > + <default>false</default> > + <uservisible>false</uservisible> > + <packagelist> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">bash</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">bzip2</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">coreutils</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">cpio</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">diffutils</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">fedora-release</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">gcc</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">gcc-c++</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">gzip</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">make</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">patch</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">perl</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">redhat-rpm-config</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">rpm-build</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">sed</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">tar</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">unzip</packagereq> > + <packagereq type="mandatory">which</packagereq> > + </packagelist> > + </group> > + <group> > <id>bulgarian-support</id> > <_name>Bulgarian Support</_name> > <_description/> > > The comps change can be made at any time, however changes to mock need to be > coordinated with the maintainer for redhat-rpm-config. I'd also like to > move /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot out of rpmdevtools and into one of the > packages already being pulled into the buildroot (redhat-rpm-config perhaps, > since it will be referencing it?), and thus we'll need to coordinate with the > rpmdevtools maintainer. > > We wouldn't be doing away with mock's ability to just use a meta-package to > populate the root, so those that want to alter what goes into the buildroot > can (just like before) build your own buildsys-build package and host it for > your mock, or define your own comps grouping, etc... > > Comments? > Works for me. I still use the buildsys-build RPM locally, but as long as we keep that ability around I'm fine. +1 Clark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGhAjNHyuj/+TTEp0RAgv1AKCZVaqMbCX1H/ZZSV4zA3CYSV0cgQCfVIaM t56WFWRZADIBmGcQDdxfGco= =qbHx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
