On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 07:55 +0200, Leszek Matok wrote: > Dnia 27-06-2007, śro o godzinie 17:30 -0400, seth vidal napisał(a): > > It doesn't notify you that it is 'updating for dependencies'? Can you > > give me a test case so I can look at it? > I was talking about upgrading a library and breaking dependencies. > Kevin's right, though, it's fixed in 3.2.1, I haven't upgraded my > Rawhide for few days now, so I stand corrected. > > An open question: is there a way to make yum update my rawhide, when > there are broken dependencies in the repos? Apt gives me "upgrade" which > upgrades only packages that can be upgraded, leaving out a small subset > of packages with broken interdependencies. Apt also gives me > "dist-upgrade", which removes packages that would otherwise keep others > from upgrading, depending on older versions. Not to mention apt-shell, > where I can decide on a per-package basis. Yum, OTOH, simply refuses to > upgrade at all, spitting some depsolving errors. Going for "yum install > <list of 100 packages>" isn't an option, you know :) > look at the skip-broken plugin, it is packaged in f7 and rawhide. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
