On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 14:04 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 14:15 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:55 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 13:38 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > > > > > > Doesn't mean it can't be discussed within FESCo... just because we > > > > discuss doesn't mean there has to be a decision tomorrow. > > > > > > True. But we're consistently running long on meetings these days. I > > > see no need to discuss it during the meeting when it's only been an RFC > > > since Monday. > > > > That's not entirely accurate, since notting sent this item to the FESCo > > mailing list last Thursday. > > FESCo list isn't public. Community people can't comment on what they > don't see. I'm aware of that. I was stating that FESCo members have almost had a week to look over that proposal, and we should be able to discuss it. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
