Re: Upgrade path question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Jackson (ajackson@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > Strawman would be if we're supporting N-2, to garbage collect after N-4?
> 
> That sounds reasonable to me.  Stride 4 would mean two years to learn a
> new name and/or upgrade, which seems plausible.
> 
> Just to be sure we're interpreting this the same way:  X was provided by
> xorg-x11 in FC-4, but modular packages in FC-5.  My interpretation of
> N-4 would be that the Prov/Obs for xorg-x11 could then be removed in the
> rawhide cycle between F-8 and F-9.

My interpretationg would be *after* F-9. I suppose that means I should
write something and send it to the PC.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux