Re: [RFC] change packaging around shared libraries, ldconfig

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham wrote:

> Rex Dieter (rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
>> Doesn't ldconfig also update ld.so.cache?  If so, won't "bad things"
>> happen if that cache is stale, like when/if 2 pkgs are installed in a
>> transaction, and pkg #2 depends on shlibs from pkg #1?
> 
> If the cache is stale, it will look in the directories for something that
> doesn't exist in the cache. I'm trying to think of a way the cache could
> point to the wrong *version* of the library, but nothing is coming to
> mind.

pkg #1 upgrade: old version includes libfoo.so.1, new version includes
libfoo.so.2
pkg #2: scriptlet requires something from pkg #1, which uses libfoo.so.2
bang.

??

-- Rex



-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux