Ville Skyttä (ville.skytta@xxxxxx) said: > On Friday 22 June 2007, Harald Hoyer wrote: > > > The next step would be to modify all initscripts in /etc/init.d to be LSB > > compliant [4]. > > Does this imply that these modified init scripts should also be > installed/removed with the LSB tools instead of chkconfig? No. You can be LSB compliant in exit status, dependencies, etc. without using the LSB wrappers (in fact, it's greatly preferred to *NOT* use the LSB wrappers.) My questions about this approach are: - where are the benchmarks? What's the actual gain? - how would this be useful for the case where facilities that are provided are determined at runtime (say, NetworkManager providing $network instead of /etc/init.d/network, or $remote_fs being provided by either rc.sysinit or /etc/init.d/netfs, depending on configuration). Similarly, you may want a meta-dependency for 'authorization available', which would be at different times depending on whether or not you're using local passwords, KRB5, etc. - does this work with dbus system activation? Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
