On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 09:01 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Did anyone exclude Docs or L10n on purpose? I did not even know, that they > were excluded. I don't think anyone did it intentionally. But once everyone started to draw a line where some were inside of the voting circle, others out, that's when existing contributors got excluded. > In fact as a maintainer, I do not know anything about how Docs > or L10n are organised, e.g. who decides on the final release notes or how > permissions are granted in cvs. So for a better discussion it may be better > if you name all the groups that in you opinion should be able to vote. This > makes it easier for Newbies like me to understand, what exactly is the > problem. To include everyone with cla_done sounds not so good to me, because > then everone in the world who gpg-signed the cla may vote, without there > beeing a clear connection to Fedora. My opinion is that anyone who is a contributor should vote. The best and only measure we have so far is, "Has FAS account." > Who are all of Fedora? Is this everyone who installed Fedora or is using a > system where Fedora is installed? Contributors. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
