Kevin Kofler wrote: > Build System <buildsys <at> redhat.com> writes: >> gentoo-0.11.56-3 >> ---------------- >> * Fri Jun 22 2007 Matthias Saou <http://freshrpms.net/> 0.11.56-3 >> - Use DESTDIR install method. >> - Remove "fedora" prefix and useless category from desktop file. > > Huh? > * Does this mean this now has no vendor? The guidelines say that > there should be a valid vendor and "fedora" should be used if > upstream doesn't use one. > * I just got lectured about how bad it is to change the name of an > existing .desktop file due to menu editing when I tried doing that > on xchat (to add "--vendor fedora", not to remove it)... That's also > mentioned in the guidelines. I had a reviewer tell me repeatedly that I needed to remove the vendor arg from desktop-file-install for one of my packages, despite my quoting the clear guidelines over and over. I think the reviewer was confused about another guidelines section which admonishes use of the Vendor: header in the spec file. Perhaps that confusion has spread? :) -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To urge more gentlemen to go into politics was the same as arguing that the cure for prostitution was to send more virgins into brothels. -- H.L. Mencken
Attachment:
pgpgOFfg4hu0H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
