Re: 586 kernels.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 04:01:23PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>   
>>  > Will they need their own spin, or just need to do a reinstall rather than an
>>  > upgrade?
>>
>> If we stop building the kernel for them they'll need their own spin.
>>     
>
> Dunno about the other 586 users but I'd probably just change distro at 
> that point, and since its easier to keep all boxes on one distro probably
> move the lot over, except for the RHEL devel boxes.
>
> Alan
>
>   
Sadly, thats probably what I'd do too.

-- 

Benjamin Lewis
Fedora Ambassador
ben.lewis@xxxxxxxxxx

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://benl.co.uk./                                 PGP Key: 0x647E480C

"In cases of major discrepancy, it is always reality that got it wrong"
                                                        -- RFC 1118

begin:vcard
fn:Benjamin Lewis (tc1415)
n:Lewis;Benjamin
email;internet:ben.lewis@xxxxxxxxxx
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux