On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 03:21:08PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 15:10 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 02:48:50PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 14:46 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 20 June 2007 14:44:54 seth vidal wrote: > > > > > so, umm > > > > > we're going to have users 'ugprading' from kernel.i586 to kernel.i386? > > > > > Is that right? > > > > > > > > They'd be going from i686 to i386 too it would seem. > > > > > > > > My brain just screams that this is confusing, but I'm not coming up with any > > > > hard problems yet. Can you do up a scratch build for us to play with Dave? > > > > > > > > > > just so we're clear, yum won't 'upgrade' a kernel from i686 to i386 and > > > let's not even start thinking about what this will mean for kernel > > > modules. > > > > Yeah. The alternative is that I un-kill 586, and we continue shipping > > that forever. (Or we just tell those 38 586 users to go make their > > own spin). > > according to what jesse just said we're also talking about it for all of > our i686 kernel users, too. Or was that mis-said? Yes. because rpm won't install a 686 package on a 586. Whereas i386 will install everywhere obviously Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
