On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 12:16 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 07:03:56PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote: > > > My understanding, FESCo (Fedora Extras Steering Committee) is to steer > > issues WRT to the Fedora Distribution [1] (formally the Fedora Extras > > Distribution), it makes sense to only allow current packagers as *they* > > are the ones that or contributing to the distribution. > > Maybe I am not following everything, but FESCo role is not that clear to > me after the merge. Areas of steering may also include release process > (for example the schedule), or not. Also previously FESCo had a role of > representing the community, though I don't know if it is really a FESCo > role, or if it is now a FAB role, for example. First, there is no FAB. FAB stands for "fedora-advisory-board" and is simply a mailing list, not a formal committee. If you meant the Fedora Ambassadors Steering Committee, that's FAmSco. Yay for ambiguous acronyms! FESCo still has a responsibility of representing the community. That is why it is comprised of people from the community, which are elected by the community itself. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
