Le dimanche 17 juin 2007 à 15:50 -0500, Arthur Pemberton a écrit : > On 6/17/07, David Timms <dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [ snip ] > > > Looking back on my response, it seems a bit disrespectful. I respect > > > your suggestions, but I do not agree with them. > > I understand - I imagine your time was short, but you wanted to say a > > lot, thanks for that. > > Arthur, am I overstepping the mark by summarizing your view as "making > > config files visible would be a bad thing", but the general idea is sane ? > > > No not exactly. > > The general idea is sane, but not worth the effort IMHO. That's what the KDE and GNOME people said a few years ago. Considering most of our desktop components have been fully or partly rewritten since the cleanup could have been largely finished by now otherwise. It would take a long time, but if the right people agreed with it we have enough code churn for other reasons it would be done in a few years without special efforts. You just don't have to think about it like a 6-month expensive task force. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
