On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 21:31 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Denis Leroy <denis <at> poolshark.org> writes: > > Installing pam_keyring isn't enough though, it still requires manual > > edition of /etc/pam.d/gdm to make it work. I was hoping to start some > > discussions on what needs to happen to make its behavior enabled > > automatically upon installation, especially since this is on the F-8 > > wish list. Should it use a scriptlet that modifies /etc/pam.d/gdm in > > %post (see http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232857 ). > > Or add a patch to the gdm package and make it require pam_keyring ? Or > > do we want to make this feature optional from authconfig ? > > What about /etc/pam.d/kdm and /etc/pam.d/kdm-np? Not every gnome-keyring-using > application necessarily always runs inside a GDM session. ;-) wow proposed mixed desktop relations. How risque. Probably if we write this into authconfig we should think how this should work. Maybe an advanced option. I have definitely had e-mails from very upset kde people that were very upset that pam_keyring was starting up gnome_keyring_daemon in their session. Just something to keep in mind. Jon -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
