Re: random comments about secondary arch proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 18:04 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> But pcc is not a primary arch, or is it? I thought only i386/x86_64
> would get the quality stamp "primary arch". :)

It was agreed that PPC wouldn't be moved to 'secondary' status until
some other architecture has come online and shown that the whole thing
actually works.

> I would go as far as to suggest test boxes on i386/x86_64
> (e.g. primary archs) for packages to test their koji builds on in case
> they want to, but don't have the archs available otherwise. 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/SecondaryArchitectures#head-2d743396d13013a983793ba4f3f020adf2a23c74

-- 
dwmw2

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux