Re: random comments about secondary arch proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 11:48 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> For an example of such a generic bug (a runtime failure which
> manifests on 
> x86_64, but is just plain broken everywhere), see:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235546
> (I already attached a fix for this one.)

I looked through the historical FE-ExcludeArch-ppc bugs and posted a
bunch more examples a few days ago too.

It actually seems to be _more_ common to find it's really a generic bug,
than it is to find it's arch-specific. That's why I so strongly oppose
just shipping the packages anyway when the build fails on some arch it
used to work on. It's a _really_ bad idea.

-- 
dwmw2

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux