Bernardo Innocenti napsal(a):
By the way, I always wanted to ask... we use caching-nameserver
because the libc resolver can only do per-process caching versus
system-wide caching, right?
If so, wouldn't nscd be a lighter weight daemon for this purpose?
Of course. nscd caching all "traffic" which is related to nsswitch
(host, passwd, services etc). Main difference between nscd and named is
that named is heavy-weight reference DNS server and nscd is here only
for nss caching purposes.
Adam
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
