On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:31:19AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 06:06 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > Can we have them in parallel ? I'm thinking of asynchronous builds of > > what constitutes Fedora done on those box and error reports being > > raised to the packager or as bugzilla entries if they fail. That would > > be one start. > > Daniel, I have a feeling you've managed to miss the _entirety_ of the > discussion that's gone before. You've presented a whole lot of rhetoric > about stuff which bears no relation to what's being proposed, and then > make a 'new' proposal which is very close to what Spot _did_ actually > suggest. Right, sorry. I will go down in my hole to avoid this in any possible future. I still think what you are suggesting in the remaining of your mail does not match what I suggested, bahh, no big deal. Sorry for interrupting your discussion, you can come back to a normal work speed. Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
