Ken YANG wrote: > Jarod Wilson wrote: >> Jarod Wilson wrote: >>> Ken YANG wrote: >>>> hi, >>>> >>>> it seems that the update about beryl still has dependence error: >>>> >>>> Error: Missing Dependency: emerald-themes >= 0.2.1 is needed by package >>>> beryl-gnome >>>> Error: Missing Dependency: heliodor >= 0.2.1 is needed by package >>>> beryl-gnome >>>> Error: Missing Dependency: emerald >= 0.2.1 is needed by package beryl-gnome >>>> >>>> i wait several days for this bug fix, but these errors still be there. >>>> >>>> please correct me if i'm wrong >>> Nope, you're correct. I've not had time to deal with beryl, its rather >>> low-priority juxtaposed to a bunch of other stuff on my plate right now. >>> Patches welcome! ;) >> Patch is dead-simple, found a few cycles this afternoon to work on this. >> New builds are slowly working their way through the build system, should >> be available on mirrors sometime soonish (where "soonish" might be >> something between "tonight" and "this upcoming weekend"... :) > > thanks for your work :-) No problem. Hopefully the last time I ever have to touch the beryl bits though... :) > by the way, the dependence error about revisor is still there: > > Error: Missing Dependency: nash = 6.0.9-4 is needed by package > libbdevid-python > > can you guide me who can i report this error to. The dependency error isn't revisor's fault, best as I can tell. Something is awry between nash and libbdevid-python there. Exactly what, I don't know, I don't work on those packages. Perhaps you should file a bug against libbdevid-python or nash. -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
