On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 11:10 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 15:19 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 23:12 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 09:36 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > > > > > The current classification we have is just > > > > "bugfix - enhancement - security". It would be nice add some more > > > > categories to this, like "cosmetic" (for minor packaging cleanups like > > > > directory ownership handling), and some way to differentiate by > > > > severity. > > > > > > Why would someone push an update for cosmetic issues? > > Because what to consider cosmetic is largely up to the eye of the > > beholder. I for one would consider changes which don't have any impact > > on a binary rpm to be cosmetic, and anything else to be "bugfix". > > > > That said, broken permissions/ownerships never are cosmetic, they are > > real bug fixes. > > Here is a typical example of what I consider cosmetic: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243689 > It's an example of what I call bug. I also consider it granted that you will be going to fix this for FC-7 ASAP. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
