On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 07:45:21AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sunday 10 June 2007 04:57:00 Axel Thimm wrote: > > No need to in 99% of what I've been doing. And the 1% was the > > transition to repomd. Why should you buildinstall if there wasn't a > > bug in anaconda? > > Right, but we're talking about fixing bugs in anaconda, or making anaconda use > a new kernel, or various other things. This is where things get tricky, so > your past history doesn't necessarily apply to the problem. Sure, but anaconda bugs are not the majority of bugs encountered. And replacing a kernel has never been a problem, I never boot any PXE system into the standard kernel, but always the updated one. So, true for fixing the i586 -> i686 bug of FC6 you need updates.img or a new anaconda spin. So if you are afraid to touch these parts, then let these bugs in - you still capture the 99% of the rest. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgps6E8tqqSPB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list