Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Neal Becker wrote: > > > Seems a bit odd: > > tetex-doc x86_64 > > It's built along with the rest of tetex, which *is* arch-specific. Yep. RPM bug/shortcomming (can't build several different arches (in this case, x86_64 + noarch) in one go). I complained about that a long time ago, was told it wasn't worth fixing. > The only way to get this to be noarch, would be to build it separately, and > the extra work/maintainance may or may not be worth the payoff. There's > lots of similar cases, kdelibs-apidocs is one that comes to mind. :) -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
