On Saturday 09 June 2007 12:48:53 Christopher Aillon wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Saturday 09 June 2007 10:11:42 Christopher Aillon wrote: > >> Can we implement some sort of auto-signing-and-pushing mechanism for > >> _testing_ packages at least? I do see the value in having a human make > >> a decision for the final repository, but am having a hard time coming up > >> with a good reason for -testing. > > > > Updates-testing wouldn't be useful then either as we could have all kinds > > of broken deps in the repo (not that we can stop it right now, but that > > is being worked on). > > So then run repoquery before pushing packages. If it causes the repo to > break, then don't push it to testing. Of course, this requires the > ability to support multiple packages per update. Patches welcome. Seriously, repoquery isn't cheap nor easy, and you can't use existing repos because you're replacing packages in those repos. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpoH7xQeR3hf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
