> >> On Thursday 07 June 2007 14:08:06 Jon Ciesla wrote: >>> Trying to upgrade, yum complains: >>> Package scons-0.97-2.fc7.noarch.rpm is not signed >>> >>> This is from my local mirror, but the one from two other official >>> mirrors >>> and d.f.r.c match it. >>> >>> rpm --checksig on all of these yields: >>> >>> scons-0.97-2.fc7.noarch.rpm: sha1 md5 OK >>> >>> Huh? >>> >>> Jon >>> >>> -- >>> novus ordo absurdum >> >> A few unsigned packages leaked out in the tree due to some tools errors >> and >> oversight. I have a new tree with signed packages and new repodata for >> the >> signed packages that I'll be uploading at some point today (once my day >> of >> meetings is over). There is some impact on users. >> >> Yum caches metadata (and packages) for a period of time (30 minutes). >> So >> changing the package checksum without changing the NVR can have some >> impact: >> >> With a warm cache, and no package in cache, it'll say your package >> doesn't >> match checksum. With a warm cache and a already cached (unsigned) >> package, >> it'll say the package is unsigned. Once cache expires, it Just >> Works(tm). >> This only effects the unsigned packages in the tree, all other >> operations >> on >> signed packages will be fine. > > So, try again tomorrow. :) Ok. Thanks. :) Still not working. Is it still a time question? I don't see a change in scons, PHP-Pear-Mail-Mime, or anything else. >> -- >> Jesse Keating >> Release Engineer: Fedora >> -- >> fedora-devel-list mailing list >> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > > > -- > novus ordo absurdum > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- novus ordo absurdum -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
