On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 01:48 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 20:26 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > yum is not broken. Broken implies it is eexpected behavior vs what > > was intended. It is exactly the intended behavior. It may be that the > > feature of installing compat arch is undesirable in certain situations > > of fedora use. However it is NOT that it is broken. I'd appreciate it > > if you'd get that straight. > > As long as it gets fixed I don't mind much whether we call it 'feature' > or 'bug'. Fixed implies broken, so you're begging the question. I think a lot of folks agree about needing to change some default behaviors. How they get changed I don't know, yet. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
