On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Jesse Keating wrote: > At the bottom of > https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/pungi/wiki/PungiDocs which is > linked to on the front page there is a link to > https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/pungi/wiki/PungiDocs/RunningPungi > > At the bottom of that there is > https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/pungi/wiki/PungiDocs/RunningPungiInMock Just a small note. As I was trying to compose my own set of packages, and (obviously) doing something wrong, I noticed that pungi somehow, somewhere, decided to use my system's yum, instead of through the config file specified with -c. I know, because my own system includes Livna, while my /etc/pungi/ has no mention of livna whatsover (and I don't want/need it on my own spin) So for testing I created /etc/pungi/f7-fedora-minimal.i386, using the minimal.manifest and overnight that did successfully build the entire tree including ISO images. I haven't had time to debug my own package set configuration yet, I am picking that up later today. Revisor looks like an interesting tool, though it adds another laywer of confusion by using/needing its own pungi files, and comes with a disclaimer that you can only build for the arch that you are currently running (unfortunately, I am running x86_64 and need to build an i386 iso). I am not sure why this requirement is in revisor. Paul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
