Colin Walters (walters@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 17:20 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > And even if there wasn't _anything_ in the python 2.4 -> 2.5 transition, > > that doesn't mean that there hasn't been in the past and won't be in the > > future. Why would we want to tie the hands of a project like that? > > I was thinking the stack would just be one (Fedora) release back, not > forever stuck. In other words you couldn't directly upgrade FC4->FC6. > If we made upgrades easy and reliable enough, there would likely be a > lot fewer people who cared about skipping versions. But it *is* already fairly easy and reliable. Heck, I did a FC5->F7 upgrade last week that worked fine. I think some of it is that we've intentionally steered people away from it when it's really not *that* bad. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
