On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 13:01 -0500, Jima wrote: > Sort of. There's no kernel maintainer for sparc32 anymore. The code's > still there, it just suffers bit-rot over time (aside from when davem is > nice and fixes bugs there, which isn't his role). Which was my point; > there isn't really an active upstream for sparc32 for us to track. Out of interest, is sparc32 really so different from sparc64 that it makes sense to have separate architecture code in the kernel rather than just a single arch/sparc? -- dwmw2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
