On Monday 2007-06-04 19:34:28 Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 6/4/07, Olivier Galibert <galibert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Really? What are your numbers and how did you come to them? Because > > every linux user I know uses *emacs or vi* except for one that uses > > nedit. > > > Rather than fall into the pointless trap of "everyone I personally > know' uses application foo" .... here are some suggestive numbers from > mugshot. > > Mugshot does include Emacs in its application stats as a text editor. > Searching for 'text editor' in mugshot's application db and you get > this: > gedit sits at #6 with 1,863 mugshot users > emacs sits at #21 with 482 > vim sits at #30 with 327 > kate sits at #70 with 80 > inkscape sits at #40 with 191 > > and for comparison the leading IDE is eclipse is #25 with 439 > and open office writer sits at #15 with 1,023 > > -jef"I use emacs, but I do not want to see it in the default install"spaleta > linuxquestions.org - Text Editor of the Year (2006) http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=514955 vi/vim 639 38.42% Kate 277 16.66% gedit 190 11.43% nano 160 9.62% KWrite 124 7.46% emacs/xemacs 114 6.86% Midnight Commander Editor mcedit 43 2.59% pico 31 1.86% Nedit 23 1.38% jEdit 24 1.44% Scite 21 1.26% joe 17 1.02% "Voters: 1663" - too less to draw a conclusion, but still something :-( I use mcedit, kate and can survive on vi only, but don't ask for mc in the default install. -- Regards, Doncho N. Gunchev, GPG key ID: 0EF40B9E, Key server: pgp.mit.edu -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
