Le lundi 04 juin 2007 à 08:59 -0600, Tom Tromey a écrit : > >>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> > 2. depends on a lot of stuff that must be kept working and > >> configured > >> > properly just for it. > >> > >> OK, this closer to a sensible argument. What are these things? > > Nicolas, I notice you didn't answer the most relevant question in > Andrew's note -- what are these things that must be kept working just > for Emacs? Legacy font system is a big one. Emacs is about its last big user, and compounds the problem with special needs (not just plain "Fixed" like about every other straggler) (That may have changed, I haven't run emacs in ages) > I read through your list and some of it seems reasonable > (Emacs has its own accessibility approach, AIUI -- not my area), but > some doesn't (print infrastructure? I think Emacs forks lpr or > whatever). And we've been moving away from lpr since lpr-ng was sidelined in favour of cups (lpr-ng was a terrific lpr system compared to the cups emulation. cups was chosen because lpr was not the target) > That asked (again), I don't see what the big deal is. Is somebody > proposing dropping Emacs or something like that? Someone objected to emacs not being in the defaults anymore. I just explained the process by which an app gets self-sidelined. And then emacs people piled more questions, like I had to justify a process that was happening without any special intervention of mine. You're right, and I'll stop responding now. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
