Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 4 juin 2007 13:39, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
Are you sure? Which desktops are these? It's obvious that those
desktops
and the corresponding users are not the primary target of fedora, but
there is currently a rather diverse offer of desktop in fedora since
there, is at least:
mwm fvwm icewm fluxbox WindowMaker twm
and certainly others.
And how many of those are activelly developped ? How many will stay in
Fedora once their packagers are asked to actually maintain the
infrastructure they need?
You have a vicious circle feature lag -> less users -> less
developpers
No, the slow developement of emacs has NOTHING to do with its number of
users. The only reason is that the technical know-how required to
contribute to emacs is quite high, because of the (convoluted) way emacs
was designed (knowledge of LISP, enjoyment of self-inflicted suffering,
...).
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
