Le dimanche 03 juin 2007 à 10:20 +0200, Hans de Goede a écrit : > Nigel Jones wrote: > > > > Now for some figures (these are rough, I'm too lazy to count exactly): > > ~40-45 packagers owning 30+ SRPMS (10.5%) > > ~100 packagers owning 10-29 SRPMS (25%) > > ~70 packagers owning 5-9 SRPMS (17%) > > ~190 packagers owning 1-4 SRPMS (46%) > > ~15-20 packagers owning 0 SRPMS (0.5%) > > (There is 1% missing over the general spread due to rounding and estimates) > > > I do not want to really go here, but if you want todo this in a fair way, try > making numbers how many % of the total number of packages is maintained by > which group. And then you can weight the packages by popularity/usefulness, so people who maintain huge perl collections most people wouldn't care less about do not get an undue bonus One guy/gal = one vote is not a perfect rule, but at least it's an honest one with no special bias (like you get when you start down the weighted votes path) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
