On Saturday 02 June 2007, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Saturday 02 June 2007 07:48:26 Ville Skyttä wrote: > > I don't think we can define __arch_install_post automatically (ie. "claim > > ownership of the macro") for all systems. If the system already had > > __arch_install_post set to something in let's say /etc/rpm/macros, what > > happens? What about ~/.rpmmacros? > > These override the redhat-rpm-macros don't they? I'm not sure of the > preference order. Neither am I, especially in the case if we include this stuff and enable it by default in a rpmdevtools subpackage. It would probably have to happen by dropping a let's say /etc/rpm/macros.rpmdevtools file; would that override something set in /etc/rpm/macros or vice versa? Anyway I guess setting it in redhat-rpm-config's defaults would be the safest way to do it. That would mean that the scripts [0] in question would be also better included in it instead of in a rpmdevtools subpackage. [0] In addition to check-buildroot, check-rpaths would be nice to have there. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
