Re: Guidelines for huge spec changelogs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Freitag, den 25.05.2007, 10:29 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
> On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 10:30 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Friday 25 May 2007 10:29:12 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > In other words, you are proposing to use detached changelogs instead of
> > > inlined ones ...
> > 
> > For archived changelogs.  Really, do you need all the changelogs _in_ the 
> > package from the late 90s?
> 
> I would personally prefer a traditional ChangeLog in cvs. 
> Of course, we still want rpm -q --changelog to tell you about the most
> recent changes...
> 

If there is a standard place for the archived changelogs, why can't rpm
-q --changelog silently go and look there?

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux