On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 10:30 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Friday 25 May 2007 10:29:12 Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > In other words, you are proposing to use detached changelogs instead of > > inlined ones ... > > For archived changelogs. Really, do you need all the changelogs _in_ the > package from the late 90s? No, actually, I never understood the usefulness of inlined changelogs, neither in VCS's (e.g. CVS's $Log$) nor in rpm.specs. If one insists on inlined changelogs, I don't see any problems in manually pruning them to "usable shape". It's what I've been doing with my packages. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
