Re: Suggestion: separate gecko package?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christopher Aillon wrote:
Martin Sourada wrote:
I don't want to complain much more about it, but I just thought it would be more effective if gecko, as is usual with linux libraries, would be distributed separately from firefox/thunderbird/seamonkey and maybe even those patched to use shared gecko instead of their own.

Google for XULRunner.  I'm aiming to get this into FC8.


That's certainly good news. Looking forward to it. :)

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux