Le dimanche 20 mai 2007 à 14:02 -0700, Eric Smith a écrit : > Bssed on the naming guidelines, I think the SRPM should be > asl-1.42-0.x.bld55.src.rpm. But my question is what to do about > the source file. Do I leave it as asl-current.tar.gz, or do I > rename it locally as asl-current-1.42-bld55.tar.gz? You leave the file as-is. Except when one needs to remove embargoed content (patented code, etc…) you shall not do any reprocessing/renaming outside the spec file, that just kills the rpm audit trail and general reproduceability. > If I leave the filename alone, it is not > possible to have multiple versions in the RPM build tree, but > perhaps that's not important. It may be important to you as packager. In that case your job is to convince upstream to fix their habits. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
