On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 23:09 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Friday, 18 May 2007 at 21:43, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:35 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > On 5/18/07, Christopher Aillon <caillon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Any one want to step to the plate? > > > > > > on a side note.... now that we are post merge we have xchat and > > > xchat-gnome in the same repo. Would it be that horrible if xchat fell > > > out of the repo? Is xchat-gnome upstream more responsive to patching? > > > > Yes, it would be very very horrible. I hate xchat-gnome. > > +1 > > Heck, +100. xchat-gnome doesn't have half the features. You do know that xchat-gnome is just a gnome front-end to xchat? It DOES have all the features of xchat, it just might not expose all of them through the UI. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
