On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 18:26 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:35 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > On 5/18/07, Christopher Aillon <caillon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Any one want to step to the plate? > > > > on a side note.... now that we are post merge we have xchat and > > xchat-gnome in the same repo. Would it be that horrible if xchat fell > > out of the repo? Is xchat-gnome upstream more responsive to patching? > > > > -jef"I'm an xchat user, but i no real reason to prefer xchat over > > xchat-gnome or vice versa"spaleta > > xchat is some of the most astoundingly bad UI design I've ever seen. You > have to manually type in a comma separated list of channels to autojoin? > WTF. On the flip side, at least last I tried it, xchat-gnome lacked > basic, vital functionality. Like autojoining channels. Or automatically > identifying to nickserv. Ummm, those functions have always been available in xchat-gnome. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
