On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 14:57 -0700, Margaret Lum wrote: > Warren Togami wrote: > > Right, unsigned in Fedora. Proprietary or 3rd party apps needing a > > signed JAR would need to provide it from a separate source. Can you > > confirm that it could be parallel installed without much trouble? > There won't be any need for this, as developers can sign at their own > discretion. Wouldn't that would break the RPM verification of the installed jss? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
