Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
In the meantime, you should try to scan/take photos of these
certificates, put them up on the web, and send a link to the images
to this thread.
Well,
Some good example:
(ALTLinux is on of the leading local russian distributions):
in English:
ftp://ftp.altlinux.ru/pub/distributions/ALTLinux/4.0/Server/license.txt
in Russian:
ftp://ftp.altlinux.ru/pub/distributions/ALTLinux/4.0/Server/license.txt.ru
We have something similar at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/EULA
Currently it finishes with:
Copyright (C) 2003, 2004, 2005 Fedora Project. All rights reserved.
...
Does this mean changes made in 2006/7 won't be covered ?
Do we need to include any year in which changes/work has been performed
{or perhaps a range}.
I am not sure whether the copyright notice is intended to protect the
EULA, or the fedora distribution itself ;)
From:
http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#noc
It suggests only the first year of publishing should be included. But it
isn't clear whether FC6 is a different work to FC7, and hence should
only show it's year of publishing ?
In my mind, FC7 is not a "re-print" of FC6 with some typos fixed - it is
more a new work. What would rh legal say about this ?
DaveT.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
